Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33064934›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2022

Relationship Between Gastrointestinal Transit, Medsger Gastrointestinal Severity, and University of California-Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 Symptoms in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.

Zsuzsanna H McMahan, Ana E Tucker, Jamie Perin, Elizabeth R Volkmann, Subhash Kulkarni, Harvey A Ziessman, Pankaj J Pasricha, Fredrick M Wigley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Systemic sclerosis.Lancet (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Management of scleroderma gastrointestinal disease: Lights and shadows.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2022
    Review
  16. Micronutrient Deficiencies in Systemic Sclerosis: A Scoping Review.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zsuzsanna H McMahanJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-6461-8940
Ana E TuckerJohns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-3774-6087
Jamie PerinJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elizabeth R VolkmannUniversity of California-Los Angeles.ORCID 0000-0003-3750-6569
Subhash KulkarniJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Harvey A ZiessmanJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pankaj J PasrichaJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Fredrick M WigleyJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Identifying predictors of treatment response in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung diseaseK23HL150237 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI VOLKMANN, ELIZABETH R · 2020 to 2024
$910k
Scleroderma and Gastrointestinal Disease: Insights into Clinical Phenotypes and Disease PathogenesisK23AR071473 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MCMAHAN, ZSUZSANNA HORTOBAGYI · 2018 to 2022
$808k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL150237NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR071473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSystemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated gastrointestinal (GI) complications are attributed to a variety of factors, including diet, microbiota dysbiosis, or GI transit abnormalities. Our objective was to examine the contribution of abnormal GI transit to SSc Medsger GI severity scores and/or University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract (UCLA GIT) 2.0 symptoms.

methodsPatients with SSc and GI symptoms (n = 71) and healthy controls (n = 18) underwent whole gut transit (WGT) scintigraphy to assess transit from the esophagus to the colon. The presence of delayed transit and percent emptying in each GI region were measured. We compared the WGT measurements between categories of the Medsger GI severity score (0-4) and across UCLA GIT 2.0 domains and total score (0-3).

resultsA total of 88% of patients had >1 abnormal region of the gut on WGT scintigraphy. All patients requiring total parenteral nutrition had delayed small bowel transit, compared to only approximately 11% of patients in other Medsger GI severity groups (P ≤ 0.01). Severe colonic transit delays were more likely in patients with Medsger GI scores of 3 (pseudo-obstruction and/or malabsorption) compared to other Medsger GI groups (P = 0.02). Seventy-percent of these patients had ≤30% colonic emptying at 72 hours. Modest associations were noted between gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and delayed esophageal (r = -0.31, P = 0.05) and gastric emptying (r = -0.32, P = 0.05).

conclusionThese data are important in providing evidence that SSc bowel disease affects transit of GI content and that delay in transit accounts in part for both bowel symptoms and Medsger GI severity. Prospective studies examining the benefit of early therapeutic intervention targeting GI transit abnormalities in patients at high risk for severe GI complications are needed.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal TransitAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadionuclide ImagingScleroderma, SystemicSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID33064934
PMCPMC8050123
OpenAlexW3093024525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.