Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33064823›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Contrast-FEL-A Test for Differences in Selective Pressures at Individual Sites among Clades and Sets of Branches.

Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond, Sadie R Wisotsky, Ananias Escalante, Brittany Rife Magalis, Steven Weaver

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergei L Kosakovsky PondInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Sadie R WisotskyInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Ananias EscalanteInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Brittany Rife MagalisInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Steven WeaverInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

An in integrated platform for multiomic analyses of pathogen and host data using scalable public infrastructureU24AI183870 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Kelsey M Beavers, Maximilian Haeussler · 2024 to 2026
$10.2M
Turning big data analysis infrastructure for HIV researchR01AI134384 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI NEKRUTENKO, ANTON, POND, SERGEI L KOSAKOVSKY · 2017 to 2021
$4.2M
HyPhy: Molecular Evolutionary AnalysesR01GM093939 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MUSE, SPENCER V., POND, SERGEI L KOSAKOVSKY · 2010 to 2018
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI134384NIAID NIH HHS U24 AI183870NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A number of evolutionary hypotheses can be tested by comparing selective pressures among sets of branches in a phylogenetic tree. When the question of interest is to identify specific sites within genes that may be evolving differently, a common approach is to perform separate analyses on subsets of sequences and compare parameter estimates in a post hoc fashion. This approach is statistically suboptimal and not always applicable. Here, we develop a simple extension of a popular fixed effects likelihood method in the context of codon-based evolutionary phylogenetic maximum likelihood testing, Contrast-FEL. It is suitable for identifying individual alignment sites where any among the K≥2 sets of branches in a phylogenetic tree have detectably different ω ratios, indicative of different selective regimes. Using extensive simulations, we show that Contrast-FEL delivers good power, exceeding 90% for sufficiently large differences, while maintaining tight control over false positive rates, when the model is correctly specified. We conclude by applying Contrast-FEL to data from five previously published studies spanning a diverse range of organisms and focusing on different evolutionary questions.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesPhylogenySelection, GeneticBrassicaceaeCytochromes bHaemosporidaHIV Reverse TranscriptaseRhodopsinRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseTrichomesCytochromes bHIV Reverse Transcriptasereverse transcriptase, Human immunodeficiency virus 1RhodopsinRibulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylasecodon modelevolutionary modelmechanisms adaptationselective differences

Identifiers

PMID33064823
PMCPMC7947784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.