Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33064764›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Planning and optimising CHAT&PLAN: A conversation-based intervention to promote person-centred care for older people living with multimorbidity.

Teresa K Corbett, Amanda Cummings, Kellyn Lee, Lynn Calman, Vicky Fenerty, Naomi Farrington, Lucy Lewis, Alexandra Young, Hilary Boddington, Theresa Wiseman and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Envisioning Minimally Disruptive Opioid Use Disorder Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A systematic review of the use of burden of treatment theory.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa K CorbettNIHR ARC Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5620-5377
Amanda CummingsMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Kellyn LeeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Lynn CalmanMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Vicky FenertyUniversity of Southampton Library, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Naomi FarringtonUniversity Hospital Southampton & University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Lucy LewisHealth Education England South East, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Otterbourne, Winchester, United Kingdom.
Alexandra YoungSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Hilary BoddingtonWessex Macmillan GP, Wessex Cancer Alliance, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Theresa WisemanThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Alison RichardsonNIHR ARC Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Mailpoint, Southampton General hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Claire FosterMacmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Jackie BridgesNIHR ARC Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBMacmillan Cancer Support · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health ICA-CL-2015-01-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder people are more likely to be living with cancer and multiple long-term conditions, but their needs, preferences for treatments, health priorities and lifestyle are often not identified or well-understood. There is a need to move towards a more comprehensive person-centred approach to care that focuses on the cumulative impact of a number of conditions on daily activities and quality of life. This paper describes the intervention planning process for CHAT& PLANTM, a structured conversation intervention to promote personalised care and support self-management in older adults with complex conditions.

methodsA theory-, evidence- and person-based approach to intervention development was undertaken. The intervention planning and development process included reviewing relevant literature and existing guidelines, developing guiding principles, conducting a behavioural analysis and constructing a logic model. Optimisation of the intervention and its implementation involved qualitative interviews with older adults with multimorbidity (n = 8), family caregivers (n = 2) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) (n = 20). Data were analysed thematically and informed changes to the intervention prototype.

resultsReview findings reflected the importance of HCPs taking a person-centred (rather than disease-centred) approach to their work with older people living with multimorbidity. This approach involves HCPs giving health service users the opportunity to voice their priorities, then using these to underpin the treatment and care plan that follow. Findings from the planning stage indicated that taking a structured approach to interactions between HCPs and health service users would enable elicitation of individual concerns, development of a plan tailored to that individual, negotiation of roles and review of goals as individual priorities change. In the optimisation stage, older adults and HCPs commented on the idea of a structured conversation to promote person-centred care and on its feasibility in practice. The idea of a shared, person-centred approach to care was viewed positively. Concerns were raised about possible extra work for those receiving or delivering care, time and staffing, and risk of creating another "tick-box" exercise for staff. Participants concluded that anyone with the appropriate skills could potentially deliver the intervention, but training was likely to be required to ensure correct utilisation and self-efficacy to deliver to the intervention.

conclusionsCHAT&PLAN, a structured person-centred conversation guide appears acceptable and appealing to HCPs and older adults with multimorbidity. Further development of the CHAT&PLAN intervention should focus on ensuring that staff are adequately trained and supported to implement the intervention.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversEvaluation Studies as TopicEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMultimorbidityPatient-Centered CarePhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of LifeSelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID33064764
PMCPMC7567392
OpenAlexW3092933268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.