Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33064749›Full record

ReviewPloS one2020

A realist review of advance care planning for people with multiple sclerosis and their families.

Laura Cottrell, Guillaume Economos, Catherine Evans, Eli Silber, Rachel Burman, Richard Nicholas, Bobbie Farsides, Stephen Ashford, Jonathan Simon Koffman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. User appraisal of a booklet for advance care planning in multiple sclerosis: a multicenter, qualitative Italian study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Neuro-oncology and supportive care: the role of the neurologist.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  12. Advance Care Planning in Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura CottrellFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Guillaume EconomosFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1743-1280
Catherine EvansFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0034-7402
Eli SilberDepartment of Neurology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Rachel BurmanFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Richard NicholasDepartment of Cellular & Molecular Neuroscience, Imperial College, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Bobbie FarsidesBrighton and Sussex Medical School University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Stephen AshfordFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan Simon KoffmanFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8513-5681
King's College London · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBCharing Cross Hospital · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health ICA-SCL-2015-01-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is reported to improve the quality of outcomes of care among those with life-limiting conditions. However, uptake is low among people living with multiple sclerosis (MS) and little is known about why or how people with MS engage in this process of decision-making.

aimsTo develop and refine an initial theory on engagement in ACP for people with MS and to identify ways to improve its uptake for those who desire it.

methodsRealist review following published protocol and reporting following Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidelines. A multi-disciplinary team searched MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar in addition to other sources from inception to August 2019. Quantitative or qualitative studies, case reports, and opinion or discussion articles related to ACP and/or end of life discussions in the context of MS were included, as well as one article on physical disability and one on motor neuron disease, that contributed important contextual information. Researchers independently screened abstracts and extracted data from full-text articles. Using abductive and retroductive analysis, each article was examined for evidence to support or refute 'context, mechanism, and outcome' (CMO) hypotheses, using the Integrated Behaviour Model to guide theory development. Quality was assessed according to methodological rigour and relevance of evidence. Those studies providing rich descriptions were synthesised using a realist matrix to identify commonalities across CMO configurations.

resultsOf the 4,034 articles identified, 33 articles were included in the synthesis that supported six CMO hypotheses that identified contexts and mechanisms underpinning engagement in ACP for people with MS and included: acceptance of their situation, prior experiences, confidence, empowerment, fear (of being a burden, of death and of dying) and the desire for autonomy. Acceptance of self as a person with a life-limiting illness was imperative as it enabled people with MS to see ACP as pertinent to them. We identified the context of MS-its long, uncertain disease trajectory with periods of stability punctuated by crisis-inhibited triggering of mechanisms. Similarly, the absence of skills and confidence in advanced communication skills among health professionals prevented possibilities for ACP discussions taking place.

conclusionAlthough mechanisms are inhibited by the context of MS, health professionals can facilitate greater uptake of ACP among those people with MS who want it by developing their skills in communication, building trusting relationships, sharing accurate prognostic information and sensitively discussing death and dying.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningEmpowermentFamilyHealth PersonnelHumansMultiple SclerosisPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf Concept

Identifiers

PMID33064749
PMCPMC7567361
OpenAlexW3092686785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.