ArticlePloS one2020
Predicting hypertension using machine learning: Findings from Qatar Biobank Study.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive variables and diagnostic performance of cross-sectional models for hypertension detection: a systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Application of machine learning in measurement of ageing and geriatric diseases: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Hypertension Detection Using Explainable Stacked Ensemble Machine Learning From Clinical and Physiological Data: A Comprehensive Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Explainable ensemble machine learning for predicting diabetes mellitus and identifying key risk factors: a population-based study in northern Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Incorporating geospatial environmental exposure indicators in individual hypertension risk prediction: a multi-stage machine learning pipeline.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Hypertension and Its Risk Factors Among Adults in the Northern Region of Bangladesh.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning for hypertension prevalence classification: a cross-sectional study in Hainan Province, China.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the multilevel determinants of low birth weight in Bangladesh: Understanding implications for targeted public health interventions.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a population-based prediction model for prevalent hypertension: evidence from Qatar biobank.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Simulating a Specialist's Treatment Experience for Hypertension Using Deep Neural Networks.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Screening hypertension using non-laboratory risk factors with machine learning: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Indonesia.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Identifying predictors and assessing causal effect on hypertension risk among adults using Double Machine Learning models: Insights from Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Predicting and improving diagnosis of tuberculosis outcomes in South Africa using machine learning techniques.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Feature Selection for Hypertension Risk Prediction Using XGBoost on Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Data.Healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of the Outcomes of Utilization of Artificial Intelligence Within the Healthcare Systems of the Middle East: A Thematic Analysis of Findings.Health science reports · 2024Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of hypertension in Bangladesh.Heliyon · 2024Article
- HyMNet: A Multimodal Deep Learning System for Hypertension Prediction Using Fundus Images and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Using Machine Learning to Evaluate the Value of Genetic Liabilities in the Classification of Hypertension within the UK Biobank.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveHypertension, a global burden, is associated with several risk factors and can be treated by lifestyle modifications and medications. Prediction and early diagnosis is important to prevent related health complications. The objective is to construct and compare predictive models to identify individuals at high risk of developing hypertension without the need of invasive clinical procedures.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study using 987 records of Qataris and long-term residents aged 18+ years from Qatar Biobank. Percentages were used to summarize data and chi-square tests to assess associations. Predictive models of hypertension were constructed and compared using three supervised machine learning algorithms: decision tree, random forest, and logistics regression using 5-fold cross-validation. The performance of algorithms was assessed using accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, F-measure, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Stata and Weka were used for analysis.
resultsAge, gender, education level, employment, tobacco use, physical activity, adequate consumption of fruits and vegetables, abdominal obesity, history of diabetes, history of high cholesterol, and mother's history high blood pressure were important predictors of hypertension. All algorithms showed more or less similar performances: Random forest (accuracy = 82.1%, PPV = 81.4%, sensitivity = 82.1%), logistic regression (accuracy = 81.1%, PPV = 80.1%, sensitivity = 81.1%) and decision tree (accuracy = 82.1%, PPV = 81.2%, sensitivity = 82.1%. In terms of AUC, compared to logistic regression, while random forest performed similarly, decision tree had a significantly lower discrimination ability (p-value<0.05) with AUC's equal to 85.0, 86.9, and 79.9, respectively.
conclusionsMachine learning provides the chance of having a rapid predictive model using non-invasive predictors to screen for hypertension. Future research should consider improving the predictive accuracy of models in larger general populations, including more important predictors and using a variety of algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.