Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33064628›Full record

Trial reportJCO global oncology2020

Outcomes for Step-Wise Implementation of a Human Papillomavirus Testing-Based Cervical Screen-and-Treat Program in El Salvador.

Karla Alfaro, Mauricio Maza, Juan C Felix, Julia C Gage, Philip E Castle, Todd A Alonzo, Andrea Chacón, Enrique González, Montserrat Soler, Gabriel Conzuelo-Rodriguez and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Karla AlfaroBasic Health International, San Salvador, El Salvador and New York, NY.
Mauricio MazaBasic Health International, San Salvador, El Salvador and New York, NY.
Juan C FelixDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Julia C GageDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Philip E CastleDivision of Cancer Prevention and Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH/DHHS, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0003-1082-6554
Todd A AlonzoKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Andrea ChacónUnidad de Cáncer, Ministerio de Salud República de El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador.
Enrique GonzálezUnidad de Cáncer, Ministerio de Salud República de El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador.
Montserrat SolerOb/Gyn & Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Gabriel Conzuelo-RodriguezBasic Health International, San Salvador, El Salvador and New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-4464-6095
Rachel MaschBasic Health International, San Salvador, El Salvador and New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3761-858X
Miriam CremerBasic Health International, San Salvador, El Salvador and New York, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Cervical Cancer Prevention in El Salvador (CAPE) project is a public-sector intervention introducing lower-cost human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in all four departments of the Paracentral region that screened a total of 28,015 women. After demonstrating success of an HPV screen-and-treat (S&T) algorithm over colposcopy management in the first two phases, the third phase scaled up the S&T strategy. We present results from phase III and evaluate S&T components across the entire project.

methodsDuring phase III, 17,965 women age 30-59 years underwent HPV testing. HPV-positive women were asked to return and, if eligible, received gas-based cryotherapy. We compare loss to follow-up and time intervals between S&T steps across the three phases.

resultsThere were no differences in HPV positivity across phases (phase I, 11.9%; phase II, 11.4%; phase III, 12.3%;

conclusionA public-sector implementation of an HPV-based S&T algorithm was successfully scaled up in El Salvador, albeit with losses in efficiency. After CAPE, the Ministry of Health changed its screening guidelines and procured additional tests to expand the program.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultEarly Detection of CancerEl SalvadorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomaviridae

Identifiers

PMID33064628
PMCPMC7605377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.