Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33064321›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2020

Heritable hazards of smoking: Applying the "clean sheet" framework to further science and policy.

Abigail P Bline, Kerry L Dearfield, David M DeMarini, Francesco Marchetti, Carole L Yauk, Jill Escher, Workshop Presenters

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nicotine and the developing brain: Insights from preclinical models.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Abigail P BlineFielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7837-1328
Kerry L DearfieldBurke, Virginia, USA.
David M DeMariniChapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8357-7988
Francesco MarchettiEnvironmental Health Science Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9435-4867
Carole L YaukDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-3454
Jill EscherEscher Fund for Autism, San Jose, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2173-4508
Workshop Presenters
Burke Foundation · USCenter for Autism and Related Disorders · USCommunities In Schools of Orange County · USHealth Canada · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Training in Molecular ToxicologyT32ES015457 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALLARD, PATRICK, HANKINSON, OLIVER NMN · 2008 to 2025
$4.0M
Environmental and Molecular MutagenesisEscher Family Fund at Silicon Valley Community FoundationNIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES015457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All the cells in our bodies are derived from the germ cells of our parents, just as our own germ cells become the bodies of our children. The integrity of the genetic information inherited from these germ cells is of paramount importance in establishing the health of each generation and perpetuating our species into the future. There is a large and growing body of evidence strongly suggesting the existence of substances that may threaten this integrity by acting as human germ cell mutagens. However, there generally are no absolute regulatory requirements to test agents for germ cell effects. In addition, the current regulatory testing paradigms do not evaluate the impacts of epigenetically mediated intergenerational effects, and there is no regulatory framework to apply new and emerging tests in regulatory decision making. At the 50th annual meeting of the Environmental Mutagenesis and Genomics Society held in Washington, DC, in September 2019, a workshop took place that examined the heritable effects of hazardous exposures to germ cells, using tobacco smoke as the example hazard. This synopsis provides a summary of areas of concern regarding heritable hazards from tobacco smoke exposures identified at the workshop and the value of the Clean Sheet framework in organizing information to address knowledge and testing gaps.

Indexed as

DNA DamageEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGerm CellsHumansMaleMutagenicity TestsMutagensPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRisk AssessmentTobacco Smoke PollutionTobacco SmokingMutagensTobacco Smoke Pollutionepigenomicsgenetic toxicologygerm cellsheritable effectsrisk assessmenttobacco smoke

Identifiers

PMID33064321
PMCPMC7756471
OpenAlexW3093149853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.