Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33064313›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2021

Breast cancer incidence in the regions of Belarus and Ukraine most contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: 1978 to 2016.

Ljubica Zupunski, Alesia Yaumenenka, Anton Ryzhov, Ilya Veyalkin, Vladimir Drozdovitch, Sergii Masiuk, Olha Ivanova, Ausrele Kesminiene, Eero Pukkala, Pavel Moiseev and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Doses from external irradiation and ingestion ofRadiation and environmental biophysics · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Ljubica ZupunskiSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2144-4247
Alesia YaumenenkaCancer Control Department, N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus.
Anton RyzhovFaculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Department of General Mathematics, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ilya VeyalkinEpidemiology Laboratory, The Republican Research Centre for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology, Gomel, Belarus.
Vladimir DrozdovitchDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Sergii MasiukDosimetry and Radiation Hygiene Department, Health Physics and Epidemiology Institute, State Institution "National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine", Kyiv, Ukraine.
Olha IvanovaDosimetry and Radiation Hygiene Department, Health Physics and Epidemiology Institute, State Institution "National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine", Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ausrele KesminieneSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Eero PukkalaFinnish Cancer Registry-Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer Research, Helsinki, Finland.
Pavel MoiseevCancer Control Department, N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus.
Anatoly PrysyazhnyukEpidemiology Department, Health Physics and Epidemiology Institute, State Institution "National Research Center for Radiation Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine", Kyiv, Ukraine.
Joachim SchüzSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Evgenia OstroumovaSection of Environment and Radiation, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Centre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRNational Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine · UAN.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre · BYRepublican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology · BYTampere University · FITaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv · UAUnited States Department of Health and Human Services · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even 30 years after the accident, an association between breast cancer incidence and ionizing radiation exposure from Chernobyl fallout remains uncertain. We studied breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus (Gomel and Mogilev) and Ukraine (Kyiv, Zhytomyr and Chernihiv) before (1978-1986) and after (1987-2016) the accident. Breast cancer cases and female population size data were received from the national cancer registries and the state departments of statistics. The study included 85 132 breast cancers with 150 million person-years at risk. We estimated annual rayon (district)-average absorbed doses to the breast from external and internal irradiation of the adult female population over the period of 1986-2016. We studied an association between rayon-average cumulative absorbed breast dose with 5-year lag, that is, excluding the exposure in 5 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis, and breast cancer incidence using negative binomial regression models. Mean (median) cumulative breast dose in 2016 was 12.3 (5.0) milligray (mGy) in Belarus and 5.7 (2.3) mGy in Ukraine, with the maximum dose of 55 mGy and 54 mGy, respectively. Breast cancer incidence rates statistically significantly increased with calendar year and attained age, and were higher in urban than in rural residents. Adjusting for time, age and urbanicity effects, we found no evidence of increasing incidence with rayon-average 5-year lagged cumulative breast dose. Owing to ecological study design limitations, a case-control study covering this area with individually reconstructed absorbed breast doses is needed testing for association between low-dose protracted radiation exposure and breast cancer risk after Chernobyl.

Indexed as

Chernobyl Nuclear AccidentRadiation DosageAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGeographyHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRadiation ExposureRegistriesRepublic of BelarusUkrainebreast cancerChernobylChornobylincidencenuclear accidentradiocesium

Identifiers

PMID33064313
PMCPMC9426215
OpenAlexW3093142487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.