Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33064196›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Changes in accommodation dynamics after alcohol consumption, for two different doses.

Miriam Casares-López, José J Castro-Torres, Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina, Carolina Ortiz, Rosario G Anera

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of the influence of alcohol and cannabis on the dynamics of the accommodative response.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Manipulating expectancies in optometry practice: Ocular accommodation and stereoacuity are sensitive to placebo and nocebo effects.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miriam Casares-LópezDepartment of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2767-4913
José J Castro-TorresDepartment of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. jjcastro@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-925X
Sonia Ortiz-PeregrinaDepartment of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Carolina OrtizDepartment of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Rosario G AneraDepartment of Optics, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund FIS2017-85058-RMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad FIS2017-85058-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this work was to evaluate possible changes in accommodation dynamics caused by the intake of different doses of alcohol.

methodsA total of 20 emmetropic subjects took part in the study. This involved a baseline session, a session after consuming 300 ml of red wine, and another after consuming 450 ml of the same wine. The accommodation dynamics were characterized for two target vergences (2.5D and 5.0D) using the Grand Seiko WAM-5500 autorefractor, which provided the accommodation and disaccommodation variables. The accommodative facility was measured using flippers of ± 2.00 D.

resultsThe mean accommodation velocities and velocity peaks were significantly lower after consuming alcohol for the higher intake, particularly for 5.0D (p < 0.05). The response time was significantly higher only for the high-intake condition for 5.0D (p < 0.05). The accommodative microfluctuations were significantly higher for both target vergences for the high-intake condition (p < 0.05). The accommodative facility was significantly impaired in both intake conditions (p < 0.05). The breath alcohol content (BrAC) was correlated with the deterioration of some variables: the accommodative facility (ρ = 0.490), and the velocity peak for 2.5D (ρ = 0.349) and 5.0D (ρ = 0.387).

conclusionsAlcohol intake affects accommodation dynamics, causing deterioration in the mean velocity, velocity peak, response time, accommodative microfluctuations, and accommodative facility, especially for the target vergence of 5.0D and high alcohol dosages.

Indexed as

Accommodation, OcularAlcohol DrinkingHumansReaction TimeAccommodation dynamicsAccommodative facilityAlcohol consumptionVisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID33064196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.