Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33063841›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2021

Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Real World Evidence: Neither Magic Nor Myth.

Hans-Georg Eichler, Francesco Pignatti, Brigitte Schwarzer-Daum, Ana Hidalgo-Simon, Irmgard Eichler, Peter Arlett, Anthony Humphreys, Spiros Vamvakas, Nikolai Brun, Guido Rasi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05587777 (REsearch on BrEast Cancer Induced Chronic Conditions Supported by Causal Analysis of Multi-source Data), which is not on this map. Cited by 116 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
21.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05587777 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

REsearch on BrEast Cancer Induced Chronic Conditions Supported by Causal Analysis of Multi-source Data

TypeobservationalSponsorHelse Stavanger HFRan2022 to 2028Enrolled150ConditionsBreast Cancer, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Hans-Georg EichlerEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Francesco PignattiEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brigitte Schwarzer-DaumMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ana Hidalgo-SimonEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Irmgard EichlerEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter ArlettEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anthony HumphreysEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Spiros VamvakasEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nikolai BrunDanish Medicines Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Guido RasiEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
European Medicines Agency · NLDanish Medicines Agency · DKLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with drugs from the blockbuster era, recently authorized drugs and those expected in the future present a heterogenous mix of chemicals, biologicals, and cell and gene therapies, a sizable fraction being for rare diseases, and even individualized treatments or individualized combinations. The shift in the nature of products entails secular trends for the definitions of "drugs" and "target population" and for clinical use and evidence generation. We discuss that the lessons learned from evidence generation for 20th century medicines may have limited relevance for 21st century medicines. We explain why the future is not about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) vs. real-world evidence (RWE) but RCTs and RWE-not just for the assessment of safety but also of effectiveness. Finally, we highlight that, in the era of precision medicine, we may not be able to reliably describe some small treatment effects-either by way of RCTs or RWE.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMutationPharmacologyPrecision MedicineCFTR protein, humanCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator

Identifiers

PMID33063841
PMCPMC8246742
OpenAlexW3093085210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.