Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33063686›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2021

Schemes and Performance Evaluation Criteria of Korean Association of External Quality Assessment (KEQAS) for Improving Laboratory Testing.

Sollip Kim, Kyunghoon Lee, Hyung-Doo Park, Yong-Wha Lee, Sail Chun, Won-Ki Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Laboratory Data Quality Evaluation in the Big Data Era.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sollip KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Inje University, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-5897
Kyunghoon LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3154-0347
Hyung-Doo ParkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1798-773X
Yong-Wha LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4459-6286
Sail ChunDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-973X
Won-Ki MinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5158-2130

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External quality assessment (EQA) is important for evaluating clinical laboratories and enhancing their testing quality. EQA schemes are variable; thus, it is crucial that the EQA organizers share their experiences to continuously improve the EQA scheme. The Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service (KEQAS) has been the leading, authorized EQA institute for the standardization and quality management of laboratory testing in Korean medical institutions since 1976. The EQA scheme underwent a major change in 2016, and the number of EQA programs increased significantly since then. The key changes implemented in EQA scheme include a fully computerized assessment to accelerate feedback and unification of the testing and reporting methods. We provide an overview of the EQA schemes and performance evaluation criteria of the KEQAS and suggest directions for achieving the global harmonization of EQA.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory ServicesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareReference StandardsRepublic of KoreaEvaluationHarmonizationKorean Association of External Quality Assessment Service (KEQAS)Laboratory testingPerformanceQualitySchemes

Identifiers

PMID33063686
PMCPMC7591290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.