ArticleScandinavian journal of urology2020
Parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary diversion: re-visiting the predictors radiologically and according to patient-reported outcome measures.
Article in Scandinavian journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Propensity Score Analysis of the Utility of Supervised Perioperative Abdominal Wall Exercises for the Prevention of Parastomal Hernia.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Repair of parastomal hernia after Bricker procedure: retrospective consecutive experience of a tertiary center.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Article
- Development and pilot testing of a patient-reported outcome measure to assess symptoms of parastomal hernia.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024Article
- Cost Effectiveness of the Use of Prophylactic Mesh To Prevent Parastomal Hernia After Urinary Diversion with an Ileal Conduit.European urology open science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the predictors of post-ileal conduit (IC) parastomal hernia (PSH) based on a standard grading methodology and according to the patients reported outcome measures (PROM).
methodsA prospective evaluation for patients with IC attending their scheduled follow-up was conducted between December 2013 and October 2015. The hernia stage was determined according to the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification as types I and II included defect size
resultsPSH was diagnosed in 138 (39.9%) patients, symptomatic in 119 (34.4%) and high-grade in 59 (17%). Independent predictors of radiologically diagnosed PSH were hypoalbuminemia (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7; 95% Confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-2.7;
conclusionsOnly a small proportion of patients with PSH were asymptomatic. Preoperative hypoalbuminemia was the most significant factor contributing to the development and symptomatizing of PSH. Previous hernia surgery further contributed to the patient complaint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.