Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33063287›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2021

Body checking behaviors and eating disorder pathology among nonbinary individuals with androgynous appearance ideals.

Claire E Cusack, M Paz Galupo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factorial Invariance of Scores on the Self-Objectification Beliefs and Behaviors Scale (SOBBS) Among Transgender and Nonbinary People.Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development : the official publication of the Association for Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claire E CusackDepartment of Psychology, Towson University, 8000 York Road, Towson, MD, USA.
M Paz GalupoDepartment of Psychology, Towson University, 8000 York Road, Towson, MD, USA. pgalupo@towson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7991-9970

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternalized sociocultural standards of attractiveness are a risk factor repeatedly linked to eating disorders; however, many nonbinary individuals do not conform to these standards. PURPOSE: This study investigated the body checking behaviors and eating disorder pathology among nonbinary individuals with androgynous appearance ideals.

methodsParticipants (n = 194) completed an online survey assessing body checking behaviors, body appreciation, gender congruence, and eating disorder pathology

resultsBody checking predicted eating disorder pathology, and body image significantly improved the model. Gender congruence did not additional variance in predicting eating pathology

conclusionThough gender congruence was not a significant predictor of eating pathology, content analysis revealed unique body behaviors specific to nonbinary individuals' gender identity and gender expression. Clinical implications include expanding perceptions of eating disorder presentation when working with nonbinary individuals with androgynous appearance ideals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cross-sectional descriptive study.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersGender IdentityBody ImageCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAndrogynyBody checkingEating disorderGender congruenceMixed methodNonbinary

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.