ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2021
Rural breast cancer survivors are able to maintain diet quality improvements during a weight loss maintenance intervention.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of an mHealth weight loss intervention on Healthy Eating Index diet quality: the SMARTER randomised controlled trial.The British journal of nutrition · 2023Trial
- Experiences of weight management during rehabilitation in breast cancer survivors: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeObesity and poor diet quality (DQ) are associated with increased risk of morbidity/mortality among breast cancer survivors. This study explored DQ changes during a weight loss maintenance intervention in a cohort of rural female breast cancer survivors (n = 131) who lost ≥ 5% body weight in a weight loss intervention. Previous analyses demonstrated significant DQ improvements during weight loss.
methodsDQ was calculated using the alternate Healthy Eating Index (aHEI)-2010. Differences in scores across time for the cohort and between those that maintained weight loss within 5% (low regainers) and those that regained > 5% (high regainers) were analyzed by linear mixed models.
resultsSignificant improvements in aHEI total score were observed from baseline (M = 52.3 ± 11) to 6 months (M = 60.7 ± 8; p < 0.001); these improvements were sustained from 6 to 18 months (M = 58.4 ± 11; p = 0.16). Total aHEI-2010 score at 18 months was higher in low regainers, compared with high regainers (60.7 vs. 56.0, p = 0.03), with healthier component scores for red meat (p = 0.01) and fruit (p = 0.04), and a trend for a healthier score for sugar-sweetened beverages (p = 0.08).
conclusionsOverall DQ improvements made during a weight loss intervention for rural breast cancer survivors were sustained during a weight loss maintenance intervention; this intervention was effective in helping low regainers maintain healthier scores in fruit, red meat, and sugar-sweetened beverage components. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Maintaining higher DQ may help breast cancer survivors maintain weight loss, thereby reducing risk of breast cancer recurrence and premature death from comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.