Observational studyDigestive diseases and sciences2021
Microscopic Colitis Is Not an Independent Risk Factor for Low Bone Density.
Observational study in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroscopic colitis (MC) is a subtype of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with overlapping risk factors for low bone density (LBD). While LBD is a known complication of IBD, its association with MC is not well-established.
aimsAssess the prevalence of LBD in MC compared to control populations, and evaluate if MC predicts LBD when controlling for confounders.
methodsRetrospective, observational case control study of adult patients with pathologically confirmed MC from 2005 to 2015. Bone density measurements were abstracted from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) reports, and bone density was classified using T-score: normal (T ≥ - 1.0), osteopenia (- 1.0 > T > -2.5) or osteoporosis (T ≤ - 2.5). Demographics, disease, medication history and LBD risk factors were obtained from chart review. Prevalence of LBD was compared to national and local controls. A matched control cohort to MC patients without prior diagnosis of LBD was analyzed with logistic regression to assess the relationship of MC to LBD.
resultsOne hundred and eighteen patients with MC were identified. Osteopenia in women with MC was more prevalent compared to national controls (67% vs. 49%, p = 0.0004), and LBD was more prevalent in MC patients compared to local controls (82% vs. 55%, p < 0.0001). In MC patients without prior diagnosis of LBD matched to controls, there was a higher prevalence of osteopenia (53.2% vs. 36.7%, p = 0.04). However, after controlling for confounders, MC was not associated with LBD (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.22, 3.16, p = 0.8).
conclusionsWhile LBD was more prevalent in MC patients compared to control populations, with adjustment for key confounders (including BMI, steroids, smoking, vitamin D and calcium use), MC was not an independent predictor of LBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.