Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33063143›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2020

[Realistic preclinical finite element simulation in knee and hip replacements].

Matthias Woiczinski, Allan Maas, Thomas Grupp, Christoph Thorwächter, Ines Santos, Peter E Müller, Volkmar Jansson, Arnd Steinbrück

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthias WoiczinskiKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. Matthias.Woiczinski@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Allan MaasKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Thomas GruppKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Christoph ThorwächterKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Ines SantosKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Peter E MüllerKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Volkmar JanssonKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Arnd SteinbrückKlinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the process of developing an implant, computer simulation involving finite element (FE) methods allows the early identification of design-related issues, thus reducing the development process to a minimum. In addition, the FE simulation is used for selecting testing combinations in order to provide the relevant authority with proof of a "worst-case" construct scenario for the subsequent experimental fatigue test.

resultsResearch studies with FE simulations show that implant positioning may affect mechanical loads under certain circumstances and, therefore, influence the preclinical evaluation of the prostheses. DISCUSSION: Although the FE simulation currently contributes significantly to preclinical testing, a standardization of the calculation models allowing comparability of results is lacking. Furthermore, the development of new dynamic and realistic models is necessary in order to identify complex damage modes that currently cannot be reproduced experimentally. When considering everyday clinical life in particular, models that can reproduce intraoperative kinematic changes and the resulting incorrect loads of the implant, as well as address these problems by changing the position or design of the prosthesis, are necessary and would help in future.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisKnee ProsthesisComputer SimulationFinite Element AnalysisHumansKneeKnee JointProsthesis DesignAnalysis, finite elementComputer modelsHip prosthesis implantationKnee arthroplasty, totalRisk assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.