Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33063137›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2021

Ultrasound-guided versus blind interventions in patellar tendon lesions: a cadaveric study.

Ferran Abat, Hakan Alfredson, Jocelio Campos, Gabriel Planells, Jordi Torras, Marc Madruga-Parera, Alfonso Rodriguez-Baeza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multifaceted uses for musculoskeletal ultrasound.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Point-of-care ultrasound in musculoskeletal field.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ferran AbatSports Orthopaedic Department, ReSport Clinic, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Passeig Fabra i Puig 47, 08030, Barcelona, Spain. abat@resportclinic.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-6640
Hakan AlfredsonDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sports Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Jocelio CamposSports Orthopaedic Department, ReSport Clinic, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Passeig Fabra i Puig 47, 08030, Barcelona, Spain.
Gabriel PlanellsPhysiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, ReSport Clinic, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi TorrasPhysiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, ReSport Clinic, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marc Madruga-PareraPhysiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, ReSport Clinic, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alfonso Rodriguez-BaezaDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Human Anatomy Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9181-5613
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study aims to analyze the accuracy of injections aimed to hit the proximal and depth part of the patellar tendon "target point" in patellar tendinopathy, comparing ultrasound-guided or non-ultrasound-guided (blind) injections.

methodsA cadaver randomized study was carried out. Injections were performed under ultrasound control, as well as blinded. There were 26 knees from fresh cadavers and injections were placed by 26 practitioners with experience in the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound and injection treatment. Each participant performed 6 ultrasound-guided and 6 blind punctures in different cadaveric specimens. This provided 312 injections that were analyzed in 2 different anatomical cuts, thus providing a database of 624 measurements for statistical analysis.

resultsStatistically significant differences were observed (p < 0.0001) in the distance from the target point between the ultrasound-guided and the non-guided infiltrations. The "unguided" injections were considered to have been performed on average 10 mm away from the target point compared to the "ultrasound-guided" injections. The ultrasound-guided injections obtained an accuracy of 74.36% while the "non-ultrasound-guided" injections obtained an accuracy of 11.54% (p < 0.0001).

conclusionThe use of ultrasound to guide the positioning of injections on the dorsal side of the proximal patellar tendon had a significantly higher accuracy compared to blind injections. The finding provides knowledge of importance for injection treatment.

Indexed as

Patellar LigamentTendinopathyCadaverHumansTendonsUltrasonography, InterventionalGuidedPatellar tendinopathyTendinitisUltrasoundUSGET

Identifiers

PMID33063137
OpenAlexW3093191281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.