Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33063117›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2021

Sofosbuvir/daclatasvir regimens for the treatment of COVID-19: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Bryony Simmons, Hannah Wentzel, Sara Mobarak, Gholamali Eslami, Anahita Sadeghi, Ali Ali Asgari, Hamideh Abbaspour Kasgari, Hafez Tirgar Fakheri, Shahin Merat, Andrew Hill

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. SARS-CoV-2 Antiviral Therapy.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021
    Review
  17. An update on drugs with therapeutic potential for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) treatment.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Mortality is not increased in SARS-CoV-2 infected persons with hepatitis C virus infection.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bryony SimmonsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Hannah WentzelSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Sara MobarakAbadan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.
Gholamali EslamiAbadan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.
Anahita SadeghiDigestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Ali AsgariDigestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamideh Abbaspour KasgariDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Hafez Tirgar FakheriGut and Liver Research Centre, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Shahin MeratDigestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Andrew HillDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRImperial College London · GBMazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe combination of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir has a well-established safety profile and improves clinical outcomes in HCV patients. In silico and in vitro studies suggest that sofosbuvir/daclatasvir may show antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2.

methodsThree clinical trials comparing sofosbuvir/daclatasvir-based regimens with a comparator in hospitalized COVID-19 patients were combined in a meta-analysis. The primary outcomes measured were clinical recovery within 14 days of randomization, time to clinical recovery and all-cause mortality. A two-step approach was used to analyse individual-level patient data. The individual trial statistics were pooled using the random-effects inverse-variance model.

resultsOur search identified eight studies of which three met the inclusion criteria (n = 176 patients); two studies were randomized and one was non-randomized. Baseline characteristics were similar across treatment arms. Clinical recovery within 14 days of randomization was higher in the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir arms compared with control arms [risk ratio = 1.34 (95% CI = 1.05-1.71), P = 0.020]. Sofosbuvir/daclatasvir improves time to clinical recovery [HR = 2.04 (95% CI = 1.25-3.32), P = 0.004]. The pooled risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir arms compared with control arms [risk ratio = 0.31 (95% CI = 0.12-0.78), P = 0.013].

conclusionsAvailable evidence suggests that sofosbuvir/daclatasvir improves survival and clinical recovery in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. However, the sample size for analysis was relatively small, one of the trials was not randomized and the designs were not standardized. These results need to be confirmed in larger randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdultAgedAntiviral AgentsCarbamatesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansImidazolesIranMaleMiddle AgedPyrrolidinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexAntiviral AgentsCarbamatesdaclatasvirImidazolesPyrrolidinesSofosbuvirValine

Identifiers

PMID33063117
PMCPMC7665526
OpenAlexW3092888321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.