ArticleCritical care explorations2020
A Pilot Study of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide in Prediction of Inhospital Cardiac Arrests.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A validated means to predict inhospital cardiac arrest is lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide, as it correlates with the progression to inhospital cardiac arrest in ICU patients. DESIGN SETTING AND PATIENTS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated ICU patients (age > 18 yr old) having inhospital cardiac arrest with advanced cardiac life support and continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring at a single academic center from 2014 to 2017. Demographics, clinical variables, and outcomes were collected. End-tidal carbon dioxide was collected from 5 to 2,880 minutes before inhospital cardiac arrest. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and model estimates were generated using a repeated-measures categorical model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation and fully specified (autoregressive) covariance to assess the effect of time on changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsA total of 788 patients were identified and 104 met inclusion criteria, where 62% were male with an average age of 58.5 years. Seventy-four percent required vasopressors and 72% experienced pulseless electrical activity. Mean end-tidal carbon dioxide 5 minutes prior to inhospital cardiac arrest was significantly lower than all evaluated time points except 180 minutes (
conclusionsMean end-tidal carbon dioxide is significantly lower immediately before inhospital cardiac arrest. The statistical and clinical significance of end-tidal carbon dioxide may highlight its utility for predicting inhospital cardiac arrest in ICU patients. Comparison analysis and modeling explorations in a larger cohort are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.