ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Plan-Do-Study-Act Methodology: Refining an Inpatient Pediatric Sepsis Screening Process.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reduction of Very Rapid Emergency Transfers to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric sepsis remains a leading cause of death of children in the United States. Timely recognition and treatment are critical to prevent the onset of severe sepsis and septic shock. Electronic screening tools aid providers in identifying patients at risk for sepsis. Our overall project goal was to decrease the number of sepsis-related emergent transfers to the pediatric intensive care unit by optimizing sepsis screening tools, interruptive alerts, and a new paper tool and huddle process using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology.
methodsOur team utilized historical data to develop inpatient electronic sepsis screening tools to identify pediatric patients at risk for sepsis. Using PDSA iterative cycles over 3 months, we tested the design of an interruptive alert, paper tool, and a new sepsis huddle process.
resultsDuring the PDSA, the clinical teams conducted huddles on all patients who received an interruptive alert (n = 35). Eighty percent of huddles had a 5.7 minute average response time and an average duration of 5.3 minutes. Completion of the huddle outcome notes occurred 83% of the time, and 70% had feedback related to the alert, paper form, and huddle process. The number of days between sepsis-related emergent transfers to the pediatric intensive care unit increased from a median of 17.5 to 57.5 days, with a single point as high as 195 days between events.
conclusionsThe inpatient sepsis team learned valuable lessons using PDSA methodology. The results of the iterative cycles allowed the team to optimize and refine the tests of change. System-wide implementation benefited from the application of this quality improvement tool.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.