Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062876›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2020

Obtaining Patient Priorities in a Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center: Beyond Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Deborah M Miller, Brandon Moss, Susannah Rose, Hong Li, David Schindler, Malory Weber, Sarah M Planchon, Jay Alberts, Adrienne Boissy, Robert Bermel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anti-CD20 associated enterovirus meningoencephalitis: A narrative review with two illustrative cases.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Deborah M MillerMellen Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
Brandon MossMellen Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
Susannah RoseLerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
Hong LiQuantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
David SchindlerQuantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
Malory WeberMellen Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
Sarah M PlanchonMellen Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
Jay AlbertsBiomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
Adrienne BoissyOffice of Patient Experience, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
Robert BermelMellen Center, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to provide patient center care, our multiple sclerosis (MS) clinic assesses patient concerns before clinical encounters, first by asking the optional qualitative question "What is the most important thing you what your health-care provider to know today" (most important concern of the patient [MIPC]) and then completing quantitative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL). Both sets of questions are designed to facilitate encounters that address patients' values and preferences.

objectiveDetermine whether the qualitative MIPC responses provided unique information not included in PROMs or clinical assessments.

methodsWe randomly selected 400 first-time MIPC responders and 400 first-time MIPC nonresponders from 2788 participants in our database. We categorized MIPC responses by content and number of unique concerns and appended them to the Neuro-QoL framework. Nonresponders were compared to those who provided 1 and 2 or more responses.

resultsSeveral MIPCs MS symptoms categories were added to the Neuro-QoL Physical domain. Most important concern of the patients work and cost-of-care categories were added to the Social Domain. Domains regarding treatment satisfaction and disease management were added. Two hundred thirty (58%) MIPC respondents reported 1 concern, 140 (35%) expressed 2 to 6 concerns, and 30 (7%) reported MS-unrelated concerns and not analyzed. Physical symptoms were the most common MIPC (69.9%). Respondents with more concerns were more likely African American, lacked private insurance, and worse disability.

conclusionsImportantly, MIPC responders described idiosyncratic symptoms, disease management, and social concerns not included in the PROMS, suggesting the MIPC question offered patients a unique opportunity to share specific concerns with their providers.

Indexed as

clinician–patient relationshipcommunicationlearning health systempatient perspectives/narrativesquantitative methodsrelationships in health care

Identifiers

PMID33062876
PMCPMC7534123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.