Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062868›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2020

Feasibility of Collecting Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

Claire Tilbury, Claudia S Leichtenberg, Bart L Kaptein, Lennard A Koster, Suzan H M Verdegaal, Ron Onstenk, Henrike M J van der Linden-van der Zwaag, Rover Krips, Herman H Kaptijn, Stephan B W Vehmeijer and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Claire TilburyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2910-3391
Claudia S LeichtenbergDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Bart L KapteinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Lennard A KosterDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Suzan H M VerdegaalDepartment of Orthopaedics, Alrijne Ziekenhuis Leiderdorp, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands.
Ron OnstenkDepartment of Orthopaedics, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, the Netherlands.
Henrike M J van der Linden-van der ZwaagDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rover KripsDepartment of Orthopaedics, Alrijne Ziekenhuis Leiderdorp, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands.
Herman H KaptijnDepartment of Orthopaedics, LangeLand Ziekenhuis, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
Stephan B W VehmeijerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands.
Willem-Jan C M MarijnissenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Jorit J L MeestersDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Stephanie M van RoodenDepartment of Advanced Data Management, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ronald BrandDepartment of Advanced Data Management, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rob G H H NelissenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Maaike G J GademanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Thea P M Vliet VlielandDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompliance rates with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected alongside arthroplasty registries vary in the literature. We described the feasibility of a routinely collected set PROMs alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

methodsThe longitudinal Leiden Orthopaedics Outcomes of OsteoArthritis Study is a multicenter (7 hospitals), observational study including patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA). A set of PROMs: Short Form-12, EuroQol 5 Dimensions, Hip/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Oxford Hip/Knee Score was collected preoperatively and at 6, 12, 24 months, and every 2 years thereafter. Participation rates and response rates were recorded.

resultsBetween June 2012 and December 2014, 1796 THA and 1636 TKA patients were invited, of whom 1043 THA (58%; mean age 68 years [standard deviation, SD: 10]) and 970 TKA patients (59%; mean age 71 years [SD 9.5]) participated in the study. At 6 months, 35 THA/38 TKA patients were lost to follow-up. Response rates were 90% for THA (898/1000) and 89% for TKA (827/932) participants. At 1 and 2 years, 8 and 18 THA and 17 and 11 TKA patients were lost to follow-up, respectively. The response rates among those eligible were 87% (866/992) and 84% (812/972) for THA and 84% (771/917) and 83% (756/906) for TKA patients, respectively. The 2-year questionnaire was completed by 78.5% of the included THA patients and by 77.9% of the included TKA patients.

conclusionsAbout 60% of patients undergoing THA or TKA complete PROMs preoperatively, with more than 80% returning follow-up PROMs. To increase the participation rates, more efforts concerning the initial recruitment of patients are needed.

Indexed as

clinician–patient relationshipcommunicationoutpatient satisfaction datapatient expectationspatient feedbackpatient satisfactionquality improvementquality of life

Identifiers

PMID33062868
PMCPMC7534142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.