Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062865›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2020

Patient Complaints: Patients' and Physicians' Interaction in Handling Complex Requests of Care.

Sanna Ryynänen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sanna RyynänenFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-7183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study report focuses on the interaction of patients' complaint cases and their related physicians' responses in handling patients' complex requests based on the dynamics of power and ideology.

methodData consist of 3 selected patients' complaints and 7 physicians' responses in a specialized medical care organization in December 2016. Data of the qualitative case study were used in narrative analysis.

resultsThe study revealed storylines of narratives ending in physicians' collective ideology of encounters with dissatisfied patients.

conclusionThe interaction between patients' complaints and physicians' responses showed emergent patterns of conflicts, which were both constraining and enabling.

Indexed as

complex responsive processdecision-makingFinlandideologyinteractionpatient complaintpatient complaint handlingpowerspecialized medical care

Identifiers

PMID33062865
PMCPMC7534125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.