Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062838›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2020

How pets factor into healthcare decisions for COVID-19: A One Health perspective.

Jennifer W Applebaum, Britni L Adams, Michelle N Eliasson, Barbara A Zsembik, Shelby E McDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Role of Human-Animal Bonds for People Experiencing Crisis Situations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Kinds of pet chosen and manner of pet acquisition during COVID 19 in Serbia.Journal of veterinary behavior : clinical applications and research : official journal of : Australian Veterinary Behaviour Interest Group, International Working Dog Breeding Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer W ApplebaumUniversity of Florida, Department of Sociology and Criminology & Law, USA.
Britni L AdamsUniversity of Florida, Department of Sociology and Criminology & Law, USA.
Michelle N EliassonUniversity of Florida, Department of Sociology and Criminology & Law, USA.
Barbara A ZsembikUniversity of Florida, Department of Sociology and Criminology & Law, USA.
Shelby E McDonaldVirginia Commonwealth University, School of Social Work, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is evidence that prioritizing pets' welfare can impact the health and well-being of their owners, especially when pet owners have a strong bond with their pet. This carries public health implications, particularly in a global public health emergency such as COVID-19. The study objective was to understand pet owners' consideration of their pets' welfare when making personal healthcare decisions specific to COVID-19. A large sample (

Indexed as

Companion animalsCOVID-19HealthcareOne HealthOne WelfarePets

Identifiers

PMID33062838
PMCPMC7543786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.