Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062816›Full record

ArticleJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)2020

Morphological Evaluation of Maxillary Premolar Canals in Iranian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Bahar Asheghi, Nariman Momtahan, Safoora Sahebi, Maryam Zangoie Booshehri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bahar AsheghiDept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Nariman MomtahanStudent Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Safoora SahebiDept. of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Maryam Zangoie BooshehriDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

statement of the problemA thorough knowledge of the morphological and anatomical variations of root canal system can help identify all root canals, adequate instrumentation, and consequently leads to a successful endodontic treatment. The knowledge of root morphology can influence the outcome of root canal therapy. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the morphology of maxillary premolar canals in Iranian population by analyzing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. MATERIALS AND

methodThis cross-sectional retrospective study consisted of CBCT of 280 patients over 16 years of age. The position, number of roots, and root morphology of maxillary premolars were inspected. The root canal configurations of maxillary premolar teeth were also analyzed according to the Vertucci classification. The statistical analyses wee performed using chi-square test. Significance level was set at

resultsIn the present study, of 462 maxillary first premolars, 8 (1.73%) teeth had three roots, 222 (48.05%) teeth had two roots, and 232 (50.22%) were single-rooted. In the second maxillary premolar group, of 400 premolars, 2 (0.5%) teeth had three roots, 34 (8.5%) teeth were two-rooted, and 364 (91%) were single-rooted. The most root canal configurations were type IV (71.64%) and type I (63%) in maxillary first and second premolars, respectively. Among females, single rooted premolars were the most prevalent (56.83%), and among males, two-rooted premolars were the most prevalent (57.61%).

conclusionThis study provided information about the root canals of maxillary premolar teeth for Iranian subpopulation leading to more optimal diagnosis and treatment planning for the endodontists. According to the findings, the complexity of root canal system and the number of roots were less common in females compared to males.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyIranian populationMaxillary premolarRoot morphology

Identifiers

PMID33062816
PMCPMC7519931
OpenAlexW3092923874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.