ArticleNMC case report journal2020
Possible Double Crush Syndrome Caused by Iatrogenic Acquired Lumbosacral Epidermoid Tumor and Concomitant Sacral Tarlov Cyst.
Article in NMC case report journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of unilateral biportal endoscopy in lumbar double crush syndrome: a retrospective study and literature-based classification.BMC surgery · 2026Review
- Giant Tarlov Cyst presenting as pelvic mass: Often doing less is better.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
- Role of electromyography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of double crush lumbar radiculopathy and common fibular injury: illustrative cases.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe a rare case of 42-year-old female who had possible double crush syndrome caused by iatrogenic spinal epidermoid tumor (ET) associated with lumbar puncture as well as concomitant sacral Tarlov cyst in close proximity. She presented with progressive left-sided perianal pain. She had a history of a Caesarean section with lumbar spinal anesthesia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a relatively small intradural extramedullary solid lesion at L5/S1 level and cystic lesion at S2 level. We considered there were two different lesions, such as a tumor and Tarlov cyst; however, we could not rule out the possibility of a single lesion with two different components. Furthermore, there was a distinct compression at more than one locations along the course of the left S2 nerve root and we suspected possible double crush syndrome. We conducted tumor removal and the lesion turned out to be two different pathologies, such as an ET and Tarlov cyst. Both lesions were intraopertively pinching the left S2 nerve root at different sites as expected. The tumor was successfully removed and the cyst wall was imbricated and sutured. We need to take the possibility of ET into consideration if the patient underwent invasive spinal procedure previously. We also have to pay attention to the possibility of double crush syndrome if the nerve root possibly holding the responsibility for symptoms is compressed at two or more sites. This is the first report of possible double crush syndrome caused by acquired spinal tumor and congenital Tarlov cyst.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.