ArticleNMC case report journal2020
Spontaneous Laminar Fracture during Successful Conservative Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis at the Adjacent Spinal Level: A Case Report.
Article in NMC case report journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although lumbar spondylolysis (LS) is regarded as a stress fracture, the underlying pathomechanism has yet to be fully elucidated. Here, we present a case that casts doubt on the notion that LS is truly a stress fracture. An 11-year-old female basketball player was brought to our clinic with a 2-week history of persistent low back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging with short TI inversion recovery (STIR-MRI) showed high signal intensity changes at the L4 pedicles bilaterally. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a faint fracture line at the left pars interarticularis. We made a diagnosis of stress fracture and recommended conservative treatment, including cessation of sports activities and wearing of a hard brace. Compliance with treatment was excellent. As expected, the STIR-MRI findings at L4 gradually resolved and bone healing was achieved. However, a follow-up STIR-MRI scan 10 weeks later revealed high signal intensity at the left L5 pedicle. Conservative treatment was continued for the findings at L5, which were considered to indicate a stress fracture (spondylolysis). Five weeks later, CT revealed a bony defect in the lamina at L5 on the left and bone union at L4. Although LS is generally considered to be a stress fracture, there have been several reports of familial occurrence and genetic predisposition. This patient's mother had also been treated for spondylolysis at L5. These observations suggest an underlying genetic etiology in this case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.