Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062553›Full record

ArticleThe mental health clinician2020

Start low, go fast? Antipsychotic titration patterns at an inpatient psychiatric hospital.

Nina Vadiei, Jonathan Chien, Jude Enwereji, Britt Myslinski, Alexander Guzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The mental health clinician, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nina VadieiAssistant Professor, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona; Assistant Professor, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, vadiei@pharmacy.arizona.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-0317
Jonathan ChienStudent, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6705-229X
Jude EnwerejiStudent, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-1329
Britt MyslinskiStudent, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7709-9964
Alexander GuzmanStudent, University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, Arizona.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-5730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAntipsychotics are commonly used to treat psychotic symptoms and severe mental illnesses. Treatment guidelines recommend antipsychotics be titrated quickly to therapeutic effect in the acute setting but acknowledge that determining the optimal dose is complicated by a delay between treatment initiation and therapeutic response. The purpose of this study was to evaluate antipsychotic titration patterns in an inpatient psychiatric hospital.

methodsThis study is a retrospective chart review of adult patients admitted to a teaching hospital and initiated on an antipsychotic for treatment of psychosis between January and December 2018. Patients were excluded if they had substance-induced psychosis, delirium, were prescribed >1 antipsychotic, or had no antipsychotic dose changes. The primary outcome was the average titration rate of the newly initiated antipsychotic. Secondary outcomes included differences in titration rate between involuntary and voluntary admissions and other antipsychotic characteristics.

resultsOf 149 patients included, the majority had a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia. Antipsychotics were titrated on average every 2 days regardless of admission type. Eighteen percent of patients were titrated to guideline-recommended maximum doses, and it took, on average, 3 days for patients to reach their final dose during hospitalization. Average length of stay was 9 days, and 43.6% of patients were readmitted within 1 year. DISCUSSION: Antipsychotics are titrated rapidly in the inpatient setting despite a lack of evidence regarding the impact of titration rate on clinical outcomes. Further studies comparing slow versus rapid titration strategies are needed to elucidate the impact of this on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

antipsychotichospitalinpatientpsychiatrytitration

Identifiers

PMID33062553
PMCPMC7534816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.