Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062525›Full record

ReviewCureus2020

Management of Patients With Chronic Pain in Ambulatory Surgery Centers.

Karina Charipova, Kyle L Gress, Ivan Urits, Omar Viswanath, Alan D Kaye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The burden of acute pain in the U.S. in the wake of the opioid crisis.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karina CharipovaMedicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA.
Kyle L GressMedicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA.
Ivan UritsAnesthesiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Omar ViswanathAnesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, USA.
Alan D KayeAnesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the setting of increasingly streamlined surgical techniques and perioperative care, the United States healthcare system is seeing a steady rise in the number of procedures being carried out at ambulatory surgery centers. Concurrently, awareness and diagnosis of both chronic pain conditions and substance use disorders have also improved in recent years. As a result of these two shifts, the demographic characteristics of patients undergoing procedures at ambulatory surgery centers are actively evolving. Chronic pain and substance use disorders are difficult to manage in both the outpatient and inpatient settings and present unique challenges in the context of perioperative planning. Both conditions are associated with worsened postoperative outcomes, including refractory pain, decreased functional status, increased length of stay, increased readmission rates, and increased economic costs. There has been a recent movement to include a preoperative risk stratification calculation for these patients, followed by the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in these patient cohorts. Taking a step further, patients benefit when standard ERAS protocols are augmented by integrating designated pain specialists into the ambulatory surgery team. This multimodal and multidisciplinary approach must be assessed in the context of the human and financial resources of a given institution and surgery center, but has been shown to improve the quality and safety of perioperative care effectively.

Indexed as

ambulatory surgery procedureschronic painenhanced recovery after surgeryoutpatientpain managementperioperative carepostoperative painrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID33062525
PMCPMC7550221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.