Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062513›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

A Novel Use of Next-Generation Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Major Limb Amputation and Amputation Revision.

Julie West, Julia Wetherhold, Steven Schulz, Ian Valerio

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06493539 (A Novel Application of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Post-Surgical Management of Lower Extremity Amputations), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06493539 phase1withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Application of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Post-Surgical Management of Lower Extremity Amputations: A Randomized Clinical Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsWound Heal, Wound DehiscenceArmsStandard of Care group, CINPWT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie WestPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Julia WetherholdPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Steven SchulzPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA.
Ian ValerioPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report our experience with next-generation incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) applied after major limb amputation or amputation revision. In this high-risk patient population, the need for reliable post-operative soft tissue management is imperative. In both cases reported, healing was uncomplicated. Using the next generation iNPWT in this unique way optimizes the post-operative residual limb by improved incision healing, residual limb edema reduction, and reduced risk of surgical site infection (SSI). This is the first case report of its kind reporting a novel use of next-generation iNPWT, and it demonstrates a need to examine this particular use further.

Indexed as

amputation revisionclosed incisional negative pressure wound therapyincisional negative pressure wound therapymajor limb amputationpost-operative managementresidual limb painsurgical site infectiontargeted muscle reinnervationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID33062513
PMCPMC7550024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.