Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062332›Full record

ArticleRadiology research and practice2020

Real-Life Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Prenatal Diagnosis.

Manuel Recio Rodríguez, Cristina Andreu-Vázquez, Israel J Thuissard-Vasallo, Raquel Cano Alonso, Carmina Bermejo López, Ines Tamarit Degenhardt, Pilar Martínez Ten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnosis and Challenges in Perinatal Health.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manuel Recio RodríguezDepartamento de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7082-7869
Cristina Andreu-VázquezDepartamento de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Israel J Thuissard-VasalloDepartamento de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6990-0619
Raquel Cano AlonsoDepartamento de Diagnóstico por Imagen, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Carmina Bermejo LópezDelta Ecografía, Madrid, Spain.
Ines Tamarit DegenhardtDepartamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar Martínez TenDelta Ecografía, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is some controversy about the value of fetal MRI in prenatal diagnosis, and most of the studies examine its accuracy in central nervous system (CNS) pathology. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of fetal MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) pathology and non-CNS pathology. Patients referred to the Radiology Department between 2007 and 2018 for a fetal MRI after detection of an anomaly in the fetal ultrasound, a high-risk pregnancy, or an inconclusive fetal ultrasound (

Identifiers

PMID33062332
PMCPMC7542514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.