Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062302›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2020

Pragmatic posterior capsular stretch and its effects on shoulder joint range of motion.

Keramat Ullah Keramat, Muhammad Naveed Babur

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04242888 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Acute Effects of Pragmatic Manual Therapy on the Range of Motion of Shoulder Joint

TypeinterventionalSponsorIsra UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled150ConditionsShoulder Impingement, Prehabilitation, RehabilitationArmspragmatic manual therapies
NCT04859387 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Pragmatic Shoulder Techniques in Comparison With Traditional Physical Therapy in Patients With Shoulder Pathologies

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation SciencesRan2020 to 2020Enrolled49ConditionsShoulder Pain, Shoulder Impingement, Shoulder Injuries, Frozen ShoulderArmsset of pragmatic shoulder technique, traditional physical therapy
NCT05064033 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pragmatic Posterior Capsular Stretch Versus Sleeper Stretch in Subject With Shoulder Pathologies: a Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation SciencesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsShoulder Impingement, Shoulder Arthritis, Shoulder Injuries, Shoulder CapsulitisArmsPragmatic Set of intervention and posterior capsular stretch, Pragmatic Set of intervention and Sleeper Stretch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keramat Ullah KeramatPhysiotherapy, Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Mansehra, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-1847-1850
Muhammad Naveed BaburIsra Institute of Rehabilitation SciencesIsra Institute, Isra University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Isra University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the immediate effects of pragmatic posterior capsular stretch (PPCS) on shoulder joint range of motion (ROM).

methodA quasi-experimental design was used to recruit healthy subjects of age 21.43 (±1.960) years, height 165.8 (±2.1069) cm and weight 63.90 (±13.187) kg. Inclusion criteria were grade 1 and grade 2 of the shoulder mobility test of functional movement screening. Preintervention and postintervention measurement of flexion, abduction, internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), reaching up behind the back (RUBTB) and reaching down behind the neck (RDBTN) were compared. A therapist-administered PPCS was the only intervention applied.

resultsPaired t-test statistics showed improvement (mean°±SD) in shoulder flexion (13.5°±8.11), abduction (11°±8.35), IR (8.5°±10.27), ER (7.83°±7.15), RUBTB (17.34°±13.81) inches and RDBTN (2.93±1.52) inches. The changes in these ROM and functional movements were statistically significant (p<0.05).

conclusionPPCS can effectively improve the functional movement of RUBTB and shoulder ROM in healthy subjects. It is recommended for the trials on prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder pathologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04242888.

Indexed as

PhysiotherapyPreventionSporting injuriesSports rehabilitation programmes

Identifiers

PMID33062302
PMCPMC7520545
OpenAlexW3084222626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.