Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33062071›Full record

SynthesisDisease markers2020

Prognostic Value of Microvessel Density in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Yanbo Dong, Guangzhi Ma, Yukun Liu, Siyu Lu, Liangfa Liu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Disease markers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic Significance of CD105-Assessed Angiogenesis in Relation to Survival and Clinicopathological Features of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Endoglin in head and neck neoplasms.Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanbo DongDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Guangzhi MaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yukun LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China.
Siyu LuDepartment of Emergency, Aviation General Hospital, Beijing 100012, China.
Liangfa LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3296-5371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic value of microvessel density (MVD) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains disputable. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively determine the prognostic value of MVD in HNSCC. Relevant literatures were identified using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis was performed to clarify the prognostic role of MVD in HNSCC patients and different subgroups. A total of 14 eligible articles were included in this meta-analysis. The combined hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for overall survival (OS) of 11 studies was 1.663 (1.236-2.237,

Indexed as

Microvascular DensityBiomarkers, TumorHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckSurvival RateBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID33062071
PMCPMC7539077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.