ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020
A Theoretical Framework for How We Learn Aesthetic Values.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived Complexity as Normalized, Integrated, Localized Shannon Entropy.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cross domain consistency of aesthetic preference-driven social behavior.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026Article
- Inferring Cinematic Aesthetic Biases from the Statistics of Early Movies.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Perceptual Complexity as Normalized Shannon Entropy.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Computational Analysis of the Effect of Hard Choices on the Individuation of Values.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- A Fisher Information Theory of Aesthetic Preference for Complexity.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Consensus and contention in beauty judgment.iScience · 2024Article
- Genetic effects on variability in visual aesthetic evaluations are partially shared across visual domains.Communications biology · 2024Article
- The aesthetic experience of general beauty and ugly-cute memes: the role of emotion.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Social groups and polarization of aesthetic values from symmetry and complexity.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Beauty isn't special: Comparing the information capacity of beauty and other sensory judgments.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Pupil Dilation Reflects Emotional Arousal Via Poetic Language.Perceptual and motor skills · 2022Article
- Does Amount of Information Support Aesthetic Values?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Swipes and Saves: A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Aesthetic Assessments and Perceived Beauty of Mobile Phone Photographs.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- What to Expect When the Unexpected Becomes Expected: Harmonic Surprise and Preference Over Time in Popular Music.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Stochasticity, Nonlinear Value Functions, and Update Rules in Learning Aesthetic Biases.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- The Aesthetic Self. The Importance of Aesthetic Taste in Music and Art for Our Perceived Identity.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How do we come to like the things that we do? Each one of us starts from a relatively similar state at birth, yet we end up with vastly different sets of aesthetic preferences. These preferences go on to define us both as individuals and as members of our cultures. Therefore, it is important to understand how aesthetic preferences form over our lifetimes. This poses a challenging problem: to understand this process, one must account for the many factors at play in the formation of aesthetic values and how these factors influence each other over time. A general framework based on basic neuroscientific principles that can also account for this process is needed. Here, we present such a framework and illustrate it through a model that accounts for the trajectories of aesthetic values over time. Our framework is inspired by meta-analytic data of neuroimaging studies of aesthetic appraisal. This framework incorporates effects of sensory inputs, rewards, and motivational states. Crucially, each one of these effects is probabilistic. We model their interactions under a reinforcement-learning circuitry. Simulations of this model and mathematical analysis of the framework lead to three main findings. First, different people may develop distinct weighing of aesthetic variables because of individual variability in motivation. Second, individuals from different cultures and environments may develop different aesthetic values because of unique sensory inputs and social rewards. Third, because learning is stochastic, stemming from probabilistic sensory inputs, motivations, and rewards, aesthetic values vary in time. These three theoretical findings account for different lines of empirical research. Through our study, we hope to provide a general and unifying framework for understanding the various aspects involved in the formation of aesthetic values over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.