Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33061866›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2020

Mineral oil: safety and use as placebo in REDUCE-IT and other clinical studies.

Brian Olshansky, Mina K Chung, Matthew J Budoff, Sephy Philip, Lixia Jiao, Ralph T Doyle, Christina Copland, Alex Giaquinto, Rebecca A Juliano, Deepak L Bhatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Adding Yttrium to SOACS omega · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Do patients benefit from omega-3 fatty acids?Cardiovascular research · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Update of the risk assessment of mineral oil hydrocarbons in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. A Critical Review of Icosapent Ethyl in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brian OlshanskyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6044-045X
Mina K ChungDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Matthew J BudoffLundquist Institute, Torrance, CA, USA.
Sephy PhilipAmarin Pharma, Inc, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Lixia JiaoAmarin Pharma, Inc, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Ralph T DoyleAmarin Pharma, Inc, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Christina CoplandAmarin Pharma, Inc, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Alex GiaquintoAmarin Pharma, Inc, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Rebecca A JulianoAmarin Pharma, Inc, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Deepak L BhattDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-6245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mineral oil is often used as a clinical trial placebo. Pharmaceutical-grade mineral oil consists of a mixture of saturated hydrocarbons, with a purity and chemical structure that differs substantially from food-grade or technical-/industrial-grade mineral oils. Interest in mineral oil was piqued by suggestions that a portion of the substantially positive results of the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) might be attributable to the theoretical negative effects of mineral oil rather than being due to the clinical benefits of icosapent ethyl. The objective of this review was to explore possible mineral oil safety and efficacy effects and contextualize these findings in light of the REDUCE-IT conclusions. A literature search identified studies employing mineral oil placebos. Eighty studies were identified and relevant data extracted. Adverse events associated with mineral oil were generally gastrointestinal and consistent with use as a lubricant laxative. Changes in triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and other biomarkers were inconsistent and generally not statistically significant, or clinically meaningful with mineral oil, as were changes in blood pressure. There was no consistent evidence that mineral oil in the amounts used in the REDUCE-IT or Effect of Vascepa on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Elevated Triglycerides on Statin Therapy (EVAPORATE) trials affects absorption of essential nutrients or drugs, including statins. These results were then considered alongside publicly available data from REDUCE-IT. Based on available evidence, mineral oil does not appear to impact medication absorption or efficacy, or related clinical outcomes, and, therefore, does not meaningfully affect study conclusions when used as a placebo at the quantities used in clinical trials.

Indexed as

C-reactive proteinHMG CoA statinsLDL-cholesterolMineral oilPlaceboTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID33061866
PMCPMC7537802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.