ReviewMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2020
Cardiac Electronic Devices: Future Directions and Challenges.
Review in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Bioinductive Effects of a Novel Antibiotic Eluting Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Envelope.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Pacemakers in Modern Cardiology and Their Transition From Traditional to Leadless Models.Cureus · 2025Review
- Application of nanoultrasonography in early diagnosis of coronary heart disease.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Open Access Data and Deep Learning for Cardiac Device Identification on Standard DICOM and Smartphone-based Chest Radiographs.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Neuro Receptor Signal Detecting and Monitoring Smart Devices for Biological Changes in Cognitive Health Conditions.Annals of neurosciences · 2024Review
- Prevention and Risk Assessment of Cardiac Device Infections in Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Anesthetic practice during cardiac implantable electronic device implant procedures: A retrospective, single-center study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023Article
- Patients' Information Needs Related to a Monitoring Implant for Heart Failure: Co-designed Study Based on Affect Stories.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Telemedical Monitoring Based on Implantable Devices-the Evolution Beyond the CardioMEMS™ Technology.Current heart failure reports · 2022Review
- Impact of Healthcare-Associated Infections Connected to Medical Devices-An Update.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- One-year Follow-up Results of the Optimal Thromboprophylaxis in Elderly Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (ChiOTEAF) registry.Journal of arrhythmia · 2021Article
- Remote monitoring and telemedicine in heart failure: implementation and benefits.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are essential management options for patients with brady- and tachyarrhythmias or heart failure with concomitant optimal pharmacotherapy. Despite increasing technological advances, there are still gaps in the management of CIED patients, eg, the growing number of lead- and pocket-related long-term complications, including cardiac device-related infective endocarditis, requires the greatest care. Likewise, patients with CIEDs should be monitored remotely as a part of a comprehensive, holistic management approach. In addition, novel technologies used in smartwatches may be a convenient tool for long-term atrial fibrillation (AF) screening, especially in high-risk populations. Early detection of AF may reduce the risk of stroke and other AF-related complications. The objective of this review article was to provide an overview of novel technologies in cardiac rhythm-management devices and future challenges related to CIEDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.