Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33061416›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2020

Estrogen-Related Receptor α (ERRα) and G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) Synergistically Indicate Poor Prognosis in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Shuang Ye, Yuanyuan Xu, Ling Wang, Kewen Zhou, Jiehua He, Jiabin Lu, Qitao Huang, Peng Sun, Tinghuai Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuang Ye *Department of Physiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, People's Republic of China.
Yuanyuan Xu *Department of Physiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, People's Republic of China.
Ling WangDepartment of Physiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, People's Republic of China.
Kewen ZhouDepartment of Physiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, People's Republic of China.
Jiehua HeState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China.
Jiabin LuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China.
Qitao HuangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China.
Peng SunState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, People's Republic of China.
Tinghuai WangDepartment of Physiology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, People's Republic of China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study aims to demonstrate the correlation between estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα) and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) expression and its predictive role in the prognosis of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

methodsA retrospective review of 199 cases of TNBC was conducted to assess the GPER and ERRα expression, and its clinicopathologic and prognostic implications. Subsequently, the effects of ERRα and GPER on cell viability, migration, and invasion induced by estrogen were also investigated in vitro.

resultsCompared to TNBCs with ERRα low expression, ERRα-high patients exhibited higher nuclear grade, more frequent lymph nodal metastasis, a higher rate of local recurrence, and distant metastasis. Survival analyses revealed that ERRα-high patients had decreased overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) than ERRα-low patients. The GPER expression level positively correlated with ERRα (R=0.167, P=0.18), and TNBCs with ERRα-low/GPER-low demonstrated the best survival outcomes among groups. In vitro, E2 significantly enhanced cell viability, migration, and invasion in BT-549 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines, which was associated with the increased expression of ERRα. Moreover, the overexpression of ERRα induced by estrogen and G1 (GPER agonist) was reversed by knocking down of GPER and blocking the MAPK signaling with PD98059 in both cell lines.

conclusionOur findings suggest that ERRα and GPER synergistically predict unfavorable prognosis in TNBCs. Mechanically, GPER mediates the upregulation expression of ERRα induced by estrogen and promotes cell viability, migration, and invasion.

Indexed as

ERRαestrogenGPERprognosistriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID33061416
PMCPMC7520096
OpenAlexW3083721362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.