Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33061413›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2020

Control as a Core Component of User Involvement in Reablement: A Qualitative Study.

Kari Jokstad, Solveig Hauge, Bjørg Th Landmark, Kirsti Skovdahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bodies at Disposal in Home Care Settings.Sociology of health & illness · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Publication Trends in Reablement - A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kari JokstadFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1661-8473
Solveig HaugeFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Bjørg Th LandmarkFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Kirsti SkovdahlFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
University of South-Eastern Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReablement, also known as restorative care, supports older adults in regaining or maintaining their independence in daily life through the optimization of functional ability. Users' goals and healthcare professionals' use of a "hands-off" approach are key, thus user involvement is central to reablement logic. The aim of this study was to explore user involvement in reablement from users' perspectives from the beginning of an intervention.

methodsThe study has an explorative qualitative design and includes thematic content analysis of data from repeat, individual semi-structured interviews with ten users accepting reablement intervention services in an urban Norwegian municipality.

findingsControl emerged as a core component. Users handed control over their time and body to professionals, balanced by drawing on an inner strength to control own limits, retain the right to make own judgements and decisions, and dream. Five themes were seen: Positive, but with a "wait and see" attitude; Professionals have goals, users have dreams; Desire to control schedule and activity; Regaining faith in one's own capacity and strengthening one's dreams; and Keep going, hold on to your dreams.

conclusionUser involvement interpreted as user-set goals may be over-emphasized. Users possess the information that professionals need to set goals, consider these the goals important for professionals, and seek to facilitate professionals in their work. Based on a belief in own competence and a trust in professional's expertise, users invite professionals into a co-creation process. User involvement has previously been defined as a willingness and positive attitude toward reablement activities, but we find it can be expressed in different ways. Reablement logic does not always match users' understanding or desires, and it may be time to rethink user involvement in reablement. The reablement concept should be developed further, so that it better suits the individuals it should serve.

Indexed as

goal-settinghome-care servicesolder adultsrestorative care

Identifiers

PMID33061413
PMCPMC7537837
OpenAlexW3091430735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.