Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33061352›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2020

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes Between Nebulized and Systemic Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of COPD in China (CONTAIN Study): A Post Hoc Analysis.

Yahong Chen, Yang Liu, Jing Zhang, Wanzhen Yao, Jingping Yang, Fan Li, Liwen Lu, Jinping Zheng, Xiaowen Han, Jin-Fu Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Nebulized corticosteroidsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Yahong Chen *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yang Liu *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jing Zhang *Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wanzhen YaoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jingping YangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Baogang Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical College, Third School of Clinical Medicine, Inner Mongolia Regional Medical Center, Baotou, People's Republic of China.
Fan LiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai Songjiang District Central Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Liwen LuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai Fengxian District Central Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jinping ZhengState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7511-661X
Xiaowen HanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hebei Provincial People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Fu XuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8039-8973
Peking University · CNTongji University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNHospital of Hebei Province · CNSongjiang District Central Hospital · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical College · CNXian Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Although corticosteroids have been widely used in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of nebulized corticosteroids (NCS), systemic corticosteroids (SCS), and NCS plus SCS in the management of AECOPD in China. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of NCS, SCS, and NCS plus SCS in Chinese patients with AECOPD. Patients and Methods: This was a real-world study of AECOPD patients at 43 sites from January to September 2014. During hospitalization, patients treated with nebulized budesonide (NCS group, n=1091), SCS (SCS group, n=709), or both (NCS+SCS group, n=1846) were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) and subgroup analyses were performed. The primary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, mortality, and change in arterial blood gases from baseline. Results: Multivariable analysis showed that the three treatments at the same severity of AECOPD were not significantly different regarding intubation rates, rates of pneumonia improvement at discharge, rates of new-onset pneumonia in hospital, and mortality. Following PSM, NCS+SCS was associated with greater length of hospital stay than both NCS and SCS (in patients without respiratory failure [RF, Conclusion: NCS is effective for patients with AECOPD, which may be an alternative treatment option. Further clinical trials are urgently needed to better understand the efficacy of NCS, SCS, and NCS+SCS in AECOPD management in China.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdrenal Cortex HormonesBudesonideChinaDisease ProgressionGlucocorticoidsHumansAdrenal Cortex HormonesBudesonideGlucocorticoidsacute exacerbationchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseclinical outcomescorticosteroids

Identifiers

PMID33061352
PMCPMC7533224
OpenAlexW3090844255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.