Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33061330›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2020

Elder Abuse Assessment Tools and Interventions for use in the Home Environment: a Scoping Review.

Kathleen Van Royen, Paul Van Royen, Liesbeth De Donder, Robbert J Gobbens

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Context of Elder Maltreatment: an Opportunity for Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Review
  12. Key signs and strategies for recognizing elder abuse.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  13. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathleen Van RoyenDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8182-7971
Paul Van RoyenDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9554-1680
Liesbeth De DonderFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4999-5902
Robbert J GobbensDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6225-5189
University of Antwerp · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimCaregivers in the home environment have an important role in timely detecting and responding to abuse. The aim of this review was to provide insight into both the existing tools for the assessment of and interventions for elder abuse by formal and informal caregivers in the home environment, and to categorize them according to a public health perspective, into primary, secondary, tertiary or quaternary prevention.

methodsWe selected the assessment tools and interventions that can be used by caregivers in the home environment included in previous reviews by Gallione et al (2017) and Fearing et al (2017). To identify published studies after these reviews, a search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane Database, CINAHL and Web of Science.

resultsIn total, fifteen assessment tools and twelve interventions were included. The number of assessment tools for elder abuse for use in the home environment is increasing; however, tools must be validated over different cultures and risk groups. In addition, the tools lack attention for the needs of vulnerable older persons such as persons with dementia. Existing interventions for caregivers in the home environment lack evidence for addressing elder abuse and do not address potential adverse effects (quaternary prevention).

conclusionAssessment tools for elder abuse need further testing for validity and reliability for use by caregivers in the home environment. For interventions, meaningful outcome measures are needed. Important to note is that quaternary prevention requires more attention. This argues for taking into account perspectives of (abused) older persons and caregivers in the development of assessment tools and interventions protocols.

Indexed as

CaregiversEnvironmentAgedAged, 80 and overCultural DeprivationDementiaElder AbuseHumansReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesassessment toolscaregiverselder abuse managementinterventionspreventionreview

Identifiers

PMID33061330
PMCPMC7533912
OpenAlexW3088253426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.