ArticlePatient preference and adherence2020
Knowledge and Attitude of the Medical Staff Concerning Cardiac Rehabilitation in Zhejiang Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The knowledge, attitudes, and practices of thoracic surgical nurses towards postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Bridging the gap: examining healthcare providers' beliefs and recommendations in cardiac rehabilitation and the determinants of their practices in China.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of cardiac rehabilitation referral among healthcare professionals in China: A mediation model.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Contextual Barriers and Facilitators to Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in China: A CFIR 2.0-Guided Systematic Review of Policy, Cultural, and Organizational Determinants.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of cardiac rehabilitation among physiotherapists in Morocco.Global cardiology science & practice · 2024Article
- Nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices about rehabilitation of patients after heart valve surgery in Namibia.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2024Article
- Predictive Value of Troponin I, Creatinine Kinase Isoenzyme and the New Japanese Severity Score in Severe Acute Pancreatitis.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the status of cardiac rehabilitation knowledge and attitude of the medical staff. PATIENTS AND
methodsA questionnaire survey of doctors and nurses was performed in the departments of cardiology of 7 teaching hospitals with attitudes, knowledge toward CR in Zhejiang Province, China, from April to September 2018, to assess Chinese medical staff for the degree of mastery and attitude toward cardiac rehabilitation.
resultsA total of 160 questionnaires were distributed and 152 valid were collected. The responding individuals included 106 nurses (69.74%) and 46 doctors (30.26%). The scores of cardiac rehabilitation knowledge were 56.68±5.06, and those of cardiac rehabilitation attitude were 15.19±3.86. Subgroup analysis showed the lower the job title (P<0.001), the lower the educational level (P = 0.011), and the shorter the years of specialty experience (P=0.005), the more negative the attitude toward cardiac rehabilitation.
conclusionThe medical staff has a good mastery of cardiac rehabilitation knowledge. But we also find that staffs with lower education level and job title, shorter specialty work experience were associated with a more negative attitude toward implement rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.