Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33061314›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2020

Psychosocial Predictors of Self-Efficacy Related to Self-Reported Adherence in Older Chronic Patients Dealing with Hypertension: A European Study.

Francesco Zanatta, Ekaterina Nissanova, Natalia Świątoniowska-Lonc, Antonia Pierobon, Giovanna Callegari, Francesca Olmetti, Guido Felicetti, Piotr Karniej, Jacek Polański, Anna Giardini and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesco ZanattaPsychology Unit of Montescano Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Montescano (PV), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6995-4190
Ekaterina NissanovaPsychology Unit of Montescano Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Montescano (PV), Italy.
Natalia Świątoniowska-LoncDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4211-9205
Antonia PierobonPsychology Unit of Montescano Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Montescano (PV), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-781X
Giovanna CallegariRespiratory Rehabilitation Unit of Montescano Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Montescano (PV), Italy.
Francesca OlmettiCardiological Rehabilitation Unit of Montescano Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Montescano (PV), Italy.
Guido FelicettiNeuromotor Rehabilitation Unit of Montescano Institute, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Montescano (PV), Italy.
Piotr KarniejDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6489-2525
Jacek PolańskiDepartment of Internal Diseases, Occupational Medicine, Hypertension and Clinical Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Anna GiardiniInformation Technology Department, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Beata Jankowska-PolańskaDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNon-adherence to clinical prescriptions is widely recognized as the most common cause of uncontrolled hypertension, contributing to develop acute and chronic cardiovascular diseases. Specifically, patients' unintentional non-adherence is related to psychosocial factors as beliefs about medications, perceived physician's communication effectiveness and medication-specific social support. The aim of this study was to observe the impact of these factors on self-efficacy in relation to pharmacological and non-pharmacological self-reported adherence among older chronic patients with hypertension. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis research had a cross-sectional, observational and multicentre study design. Italian inpatients under rehabilitation, and Polish inpatients/outpatients were recruited. Following a cognitive screening, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained. Data on clinical and behavioral adherence (i.e., pharmacological adherence, adherence to refill medicines, intentional non-adherence) and psychosocial factors related to treatment adherence (i.e., beliefs about medicines, physician's communication skills, medication-specific social support, psychological antecedents and self-efficacy) were collected with self-report questionnaires.

resultsA total of 458 patients were recruited. Fischer's LSD post hoc test revealed significant differences between Italian and Polish samples in all measures (p<0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed low self-reported intentional non-adherence (β = -.02, p=0.031), high self-reported adherence to refill medications (β=-.05, p=0.017), high levels of perceived physician's communication effectiveness (β=0.11, p<0.001), positive beliefs about medications (β=0.13, p<0.001), and high perceived medication-specific social support (β=0.05, p<0.001) to predict significantly high patients' self-efficacy in relation to pharmacological and non-pharmacological self-reported adherence.

conclusionThe observed psychosocial and behavioral factors revealed to positively impact on self-efficacy in relation to treatment adherence among older chronic patients dealing with hypertension. In a prevention framework, future studies and clinical practice may consider these factors in order to improve assessment and intervention on adherence in this population.

Indexed as

chronicityhypertensionolder patientspsychosocialself-efficacyself-reported adherence

Identifiers

PMID33061314
PMCPMC7524841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.