Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33061227›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2020

Protective effect of

Preethi Concessao, Laxminarayana Kurady Bairy, Archana Parampalli Raghavendra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dual Neuroprotective and Nephroprotective Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Neuroprotective potential ofVeterinary world · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Role of medicinal plants in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 and in the management of post-COVID-19 complications.Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Preethi ConcessaoDepartment of Physiology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Laxminarayana Kurady BairyDepartment of Pharmacology, RAK College of Medical Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.
Archana Parampalli RaghavendraDepartment of Physiology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INRas al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimIntoxication of arsenic in rats is known to result in neurological effects as well as liver and kidney dysfunction. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe experiment was divided into short-term treatment (45 days) and long-term treatment (90 days), with each group divided into nine sub-groups consisting of six animals each. Sub-groups 1 and 2 served as normal, and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) controls, respectively. Sub-groups 3-9 received sodium arsenite in drinking water (50 mg/L). In addition, sub-group 4 received NAC (210 mg/kg b.wt) orally once daily, sub-groups 5-7 received aqueous seed extract of

resultsIn the short-term treatment, groups administered with

conclusionThe seed extract of

Indexed as

hippocampuskidney functionsliver functionsmemory and learningMucuna prurienssodium arsenite

Identifiers

PMID33061227
PMCPMC7522945
OpenAlexW3048559630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.