Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33061209›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020

Reviewing the clinical utility of ventricular assist device log files.

Sam Emmanuel, Jared Engelman, Christopher Simon Hayward

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 63% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sam EmmanuelCardiology Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1022-1539
Jared EngelmanSchool of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Christopher Simon HaywardCardiology Department, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentricular assist devices (VADs) have provided a temporising solution to many individuals with refractory heart failure (HF) while awaiting a suitable donor for heart transplantation which remains the gold standard in treatment. Many of the discussions around VADs involve ongoing morbidity; however, one aspect of VADs that is often overlooked is the utility of their log files. We decided to review the literature for mentions of the clinical utility of VAD log files.

methodsA keyword search was utilised on PUBMED using the terms 'Ventricular Assist Device' and 'Log files'. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this search only yielded 4 results with further articles being discovered through the bibliography of these publications.

resultsThe 4 identified articles provided basic information on log files, particularly with reference to the HVAD. Logs can be categorised into three types-data (pump parameters), events (changes in parameters) and alarms (abnormal function). Using a combination of these logs, we can readily identify abnormal pump operation such as the development and progression of pump thrombosis, suction events and gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the research potential of log files was not discussed in these publications, particularly as it pertains to areas such as studying speed modulation and pulsatility in VADs.

conclusionsVADs are an important staple in the treatment of patients with refractory HF. Log files provide a treasure-trove of information and knowledge that can be utilised for clinical benefit. Furthermore, log files provide an excellent tool for conducting research into device functionality. Current literature on the clinical utility of log files is sparse with much untapped potential.

Indexed as

Ventricular assist device log files

Identifiers

PMID33061209
PMCPMC7538513
OpenAlexW3008024169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.