ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2020
Combination of internal (epicardial) and external (transthoracic) defibrillation during heart surgery.
Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis report describes a modified defibrillation technique during cardiac surgery using a combined internal (epicardial) and external (transthoracic) defibrillation system.
methodsWe routinely used 30 J (J) shock between the epicardial pad placed directly onto the right atrium and the left anterolateral transthoracic pad placed in the left anterolateral chest wall directly to the skin in the area of the cardiac apex under the nipple.
resultsThirty-two patients whom developed ventricular fibrillation (VF) during surgery were managed in theatre using this method. A single 30 J shock was successfully given in 29 patients while the remaining three required an additional shock with the same amount (30 J).
conclusionsWe believe that this technique is safe and complications free. It is easy to perform especially in patients with difficult access such as redo operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.