Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33061064›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2019

Follow-up and management of valvular heart disease patients with prosthetic valve: a clinical practice guideline for Indian scenario.

Devendra Saksena, Yugal K Mishra, S Muralidharan, Vivek Kanhere, Pankaj Srivastava, C P Srivastava, VHD India consensus committee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Strategies for combating antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Detailing' an obstetric conundrum with COVID-19.Medical journal, Armed Forces India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Devendra SaksenaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bombay Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Yugal K MishraManipal Hospital, New Delhi, India.
S MuralidharanGKNM Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Vivek KanhereChirayu Health Centre, Bhopal, India.
Pankaj SrivastavaDivine Heart & Multi-speciality Hospital, Lucknow, India.
C P SrivastavaNarayana Hrudayalaya, Jaipur, India.
VHD India consensus committee
Bombay Hospital · INChirayu Medical College & Hospital · ING. Kuppuswamy Naidu Memorial Hospital · INManipal Hospital · INNarayana Health · INTamil Nadu Government Multi Super Speciality Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeValvular heart disease (VHD) patients after prosthetic valve implantation are at risk of thromboembolic events. Follow-up care of patients with prosthetic valve has a paramount role in reducing the morbidity and mortality. Currently, in India, there is quintessential need to stream line the follow-up care of prosthetic valve patients. This mandates the development of a consensus guideline for the antithrombotic therapy in VHD patients post prosthetic valve implantation.

methodsA national level panel was constituted comprising 13 leading cardio care experts in India who thoroughly reviewed the up to date literature, formulated the recommendations, and developed the consensus document. Later on, extensive discussions were held on this draft and the recommendations in 8 regional meetings involving 79 additional experts from the cardio care in India, to arrive at a consensus. The final consensus document is developed relying on the available evidence and/or majority consensus from all the meetings.

resultsThe panel recommended vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy with individualized target international normalized ratio (INR) in VHD patients after prosthetic valve implantation. The panel opined that management of prosthetic valve complications should be personalized on the basis of type of complications. In addition, the panel recommends to distinguish individuals with various co-morbidities and attend them appropriately.

conclusionsAnticoagulant therapy with VKA seems to be an effective option post prosthetic valve implantation in VHD patients. However, the role for non-VKA oral therapy in prosthetic valve patients and the safety and efficacy of novel oral anticoagulants in patients with bioprosthetic valve need to be studied extensively.

Indexed as

Anti-CoagulationProsthetic valvesValvular heart disease

Identifiers

PMID33061064
PMCPMC7525528
OpenAlexW2912824813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.