ReviewIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2019
TAVR-present, future, and challenges in developing countries.
Review in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with atrial fibrillation.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Machine Learning for Predicting Mortality Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Scoping Review of Current Literature.CJC open · 2026Review
- Safety and Device Success of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A 12-Year Single-Center VARC-3 Report.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Observational
- Article
- Prognostic value of left atrioventricular coupling index in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a prospective echocardiographic study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Incidence and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement:Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2025Article
- Survival outcomes of TAVR and self-expanding versus balloon-expandable valves in patients with advanced cardiac dysfunction.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Feasibility of 3-dimensional printed models in simulated training and teaching of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Article
- Validating In Silico and In Vitro Patient-Specific Structural and Flow Models with Transcatheter Bicuspid Aortic Valve Replacement Procedure.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2022Article
- Article
- Transcatheter mitral edge-to-edge repair vs optimal medical therapy in secondary mitral regurgitation: a meta-analysis.REC, interventional cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a well-established therapy for inoperable and high-risk patients of Aortic Stenosis in most of the part of the world. The technological advancements in the hemodynamic performance and design of valve prosthesis and also the data provided by various trials regarding the safety and efficacy of TAVR have widened the scope of TAVR in intermediate and low-risk groups also. The main focus of this review is to discuss the feasibility of TAVR in developing countries. Along with this review, it also gives a detailed outlook of the pros and cons of TAVR along with insight into the future of TAVR and its adoption into the low-risk group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.