Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33060882›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of medical sciences2020

The Impact of Sex Differences on Renal Protective Effects of Lipopolysaccharide Preconditioning in Septic Shock.

Mehri Kadkhodaee, Behjat Seifi, Mina Ranjbaran, Sedigheh Shams, Fatemeh Delavari, Atefeh Najafi, Zahra Sedaghat, Hossein Khastar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sex differences in cardiovascular response to sepsis.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mehri KadkhodaeeDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Behjat SeifiDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mina RanjbaranDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sedigheh ShamsChildren's Medical Center, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh DelavariDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Atefeh NajafiDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra SedaghatDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
Hossein KhastarDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRBushehr University of Medical Sciences · IRChildren's Medical Center · IRShahroud University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInduction of septic shock by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) may lead to acute renal failure. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of sex differences on the effectiveness of low-dose LPS preconditioning (LPS-PC) on LPS-induced acute renal failure in rats.

methodsThis study was conducted at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, in 2017. A total of 48 Wistar rats were equally divided into two groups of male and female rats. The rats in each group were then allocated to three groups (n=8 per group), namely control, septic shock, and LPS-PC group. A high dose of LPS was administered for septic shock induction. LPS-PC was induced by injecting LPS before sepsis induction. The effect of sex differences on renal functional indices, renal oxidative stress markers, plasma tumor necrosis factor-α level, and renal histological changes was evaluated. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's

resultsIn the septic shock groups, renal functional parameters (creatinine [Cr] and blood urea nitrogen [BUN]) were increased in both sexes. However, the increase was more significant in male rats (male rats: Cr=2.14±0.13, BUN=81±4.15; female rats: Cr=1.64±0.12, BUN=50±2.7). LPS-PC reduced these indices in both sexes (male rats: Cr=1.24±0.03, BUN=57±4.1; female rats: Cr=0.86±0.02, BUN=30.31±2.25). Renal superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (male rats: 11.54±1.34, female rats: 24.4±2.04) and catalase (CAT) activity (male rats: 15±1.74, female rats: 25.75±1.97) were significantly higher in the female septic group. LPS-PC significantly increased SOD (male rats: 25.7±2.45, female rats: 42.6±3.31) and CAT (male rats: 37.25±2.34, female rats: 59.21±3.29) activities in renal tissue samples in the LPS-PC group in both sexes compared to the septic groups. In the LPS groups, plasma tumor necrosis factor-α (male rats: 375±25.65, female rats: 285.45±25.94) were significantly higher than in the LPS-PC groups (male rats: 250±21.35, female rats: 121±24.14).

conclusionMale rats were more susceptible to sepsis-induced renal damage. LPS-PC had protective effects on the LPS-induced renal injury, and these effects were most prominent in female rats.

Indexed as

LipopolysaccharidesRenalSeptic shockSex differences

Identifiers

PMID33060882
PMCPMC7519401
OpenAlexW3041694331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.