Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33060872›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2020

Template Independent Component Analysis: Targeted and Reliable Estimation of Subject-level Brain Networks using Big Data Population Priors.

Amanda F Mejia, Mary Beth Nebel, Yikai Wang, Brian S Caffo, Ying Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Template independent component analysis with spatial priors for accurate subject-level brain network estimation and inference.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Improving power in functional magnetic resonance imaging by moving beyond cluster-level inference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Social cognitive network neuroscience.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda F MejiaDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408.
Mary Beth NebelCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Yikai WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Brian S CaffoDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Ying GuoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322.

Funding

Statistical ICA Methods for Analysis & Integration of Multi-dimensional Data Diversity SupplementR01MH105561 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, KANG, JIAN · 2014 to 2024
$4.3M
Novel Approaches for CEST Labeling, Detection, Quantification and TranslationR01EB015032 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2011 to 2019
$3.9M
Bayesian methods for cortical surface neuroimaging dataR01EB027119 · NIBIB · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MEJIA, AMANDA · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
Visual-Motor Development in Infants at High Risk for AutismK01MH109766 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI NEBEL, MARY BETH · 2016 to 2020
$753k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015032NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027119NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH109766NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large brain imaging databases contain a wealth of information on brain organization in the populations they target, and on individual variability. While such databases have been used to study group-level features of populations directly, they are currently underutilized as a resource to inform single-subject analysis. Here, we propose leveraging the information contained in large functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) databases by establishing population priors to employ in an empirical Bayesian framework. We focus on estimation of brain networks as source signals in independent component analysis (ICA). We formulate a hierarchical "template" ICA model where source signals-including known population brain networks and subject-specific signals-are represented as latent variables. For estimation, we derive an expectation maximization (EM) algorithm having an explicit solution. However, as this solution is computationally intractable, we also consider an approximate subspace algorithm and a faster two-stage approach. Through extensive simulation studies, we assess performance of both methods and compare with dual regression, a popular but ad-hoc method. The two proposed algorithms have similar performance, and both dramatically outperform dual regression. We also conduct a reliability study utilizing the Human Connectome Project and find that template ICA achieves substantially better performance than dual regression, achieving 75-250% higher intra-subject reliability.

Identifiers

PMID33060872
PMCPMC7556739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.