Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33060768›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Analysis of the serial circulating tumor cell count during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Sungchan Gwark, Jisun Kim, Nak-Jung Kwon, Kyoung-Yeon Kim, YongNam Kim, Cham Han Lee, Young Hun Kim, Myoung Shin Kim, Sung Woo Hong, Mi Young Choi and 16 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Sungchan GwarkDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jisun KimDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. jisunkim@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4884-6107
Nak-Jung KwonMacrogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Kyoung-Yeon KimMacrogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
YongNam KimMacrogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Cham Han LeeCytogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Young Hun KimCytogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Myoung Shin KimCytogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Woo HongCytogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Mi Young ChoiCytogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Byung Hee JeonCytogen Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Suhwan ChangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jonghan YuDepartment of Surgery, Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Yeon ParkDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Jin LeeDepartment of Pathology, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4963-6603
Sae Byul LeeDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Il Yong ChungDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5271-8530
Beom Seok KoDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Jeong KimDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jong Won LeeDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7875-1603
Byung Ho SonDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6757-0388
Jin-Hee AhnDepartment of Oncology, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Hae JungDepartment of Oncology, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Sung-Bae KimDepartment of Oncology, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Gyung-Yub GongDepartment of Pathology, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Sei Hyun AhnDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the prognostic implications of the circulating tumor cell (CTC) count in non-metastatic, HER2-negative breast cancer patients who failed to achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). A total of 173, non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with NCT were prospectively enrolled. CTCs were obtained from blood drawn pre-NCT and post-NCT using a SMART BIOPSY SYSTEM isolation kit (Cytogen Inc., Seoul, Korea) with immunofluorescence staining. Excluding 26 HER2-positive patients, Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) related to the CTC count and the association of the CTC count with the treatment response to given therapy were analyzed in 147 HER2-negative patients. Among 147 HER2-negative patients, 28 relapses (19.0%) and 13 deaths (8.8%, all breast cancer-specific) were observed during a median follow-up of 37.3 months. One hundred and seven patients (72.8%) were hormone receptor-positive, and 40 patients (27.2%) had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). One or more CTCs were identified in 88 of the 147 patients (59.9%) before NCT and 77 of the 134 patients (52.4%) after NCT. In the entire HER2-negative patient cohort, the initial nodal status was the most significant factor influencing RFS and OS. In TNBC, 11 patients (27.5%) achieved pCR and patients that failed to achieve pCR with ≥ 5 CTCs after NCT, showed worse RFS (HR, 10.66; 95% CI, 1.80-63.07; p = 0.009) and OS (HR, 14.00; 95% CI, 1.26-155.53; p = 0.032). The patients with residual tumor and a high number of the CTCs after NCT displayed the worse outcome. These findings could provide justification to launch a future, well designed trial with longer follow-up data to obtain regulatory approval for clinical use of the assay, especially for the ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer subset.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell CountChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMCF-7 CellsMicroscopy, FluorescenceMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID33060768
PMCPMC7562710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.